iasi new lime mineral processing production line sell at a loss

productivity, profitability, production and export structures along the value chain in china - sciencedirect

This paper incorporates Chinese inputoutput tables, firm-level manufacturing data and transaction-level customs data into a unified value chain framework, which allows us to study the value chain position for all industries, regions, and firms in China. We then apply this framework to analyze firms production and export performances along the value chain and document the following patterns: (1). Both start-up capital stock and the annual investment expenses are higher for upstream firms, which makes the upstream firms more capital intensive. (2). Both productivity and profitability are higher for these upstream firms. (3). Counter-intuitively, the underdeveloped provinces, which are often thought to be more labor-abundant, are concentrated in the capital-intensive upstream industries. We suggest that the Third Front Construction policy implemented between 1964 and 1980 in China could play some role for this counter-intuitive finding. (4). Both production and export upstreamness have increased after year 2002.

We thank the editor Andrei A. Levchenko, two anonymous referees for very valuable comments and suggestions. We also thank Nadim Ahmad, Hanwei Huang, Meixin Guo, Lin Lu, Hong Ma, Shang-Jin Wei for helpful discussions, as well as the participants at the International Conference on Global Value Chains and Structural Adjustments (2013), IEFS China Conference (2013), 17th IEA World Congress (2014), Global Value Chain Training and Research Workshop (2014). This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in UIBE (No. 14QD04), and by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71433002). All remaining errors are our own.

production technology | grenzebach

Our passion lies in finding solutions, which attracts manufacturers of many different industries. As an international high-tech company, we supply production plants which distinguish themselves with regards to quality, reliability and long service life. Together, with our customers, we think about the future!

Our approach: holistic solutions that are configured to your needs. Whether insulation materials, gypsum, wood, float glass or solar - in these areas you are perfectly equipped for the daily challenges of your market with our production plants. Our deep understanding of yourrequirements, your customers expectations and technological developments makes us a strategic automation partner.

As a globally operating family-owned company, we stand for both security and flexibility. In this role, Grenzebach accompanies businesses worldwide throughout the whole value chain and the entire product lifecycle. Chase your goals with Grenzebach responsibly and sustainably.

Insulation materials made from mineral wool, wood fiber and cellulose help to boost the energy efficiency of buildings. Whatever type of insulation material you need: Grenzebach supplies the production technology. Our systems help you do everything - from manufacture through to processing and finishing. We supply individual components as well as complete production lines.

Sand, lime, dolomite and soda are all used to make the exceptional material that is glass. Producing glass is a complex process and collaborating with you to improve it is something we do with a passion. With over 300 systems installed internationally, Grenzebach and CNUD EFCO GFT are hugely experienced in the sector.

Gypsum, the building material of modern interior work, has to fullfill a wide range of performance requirements. In order to meet varoius product demands, Grenzebach supplies customized production solutions. As a full-line partner, we provide comprehensive support in the production of gypsum plaster, plasterboard, and gypsum wallboard.

Veneer producers place a special emphasis on low final moisture and highest surface quality of the veneers produced. Grenzebach offers drying technology for best and uniform product qualities, for furniture or plywood veneers.

processing trade and costs of incomplete liberalization: the case of china - sciencedirect

A major objective of policies promoting processing trade in developing countries is integration with global markets. A central feature of processing regimes is that firms do not have to pay tariffs on imported inputs as long as they are used exclusively in the production of goods for export. These firms are typically restricted from selling output using imported inputs on the domestic market. These restrictions can be viewed as a form of incomplete liberalization due to protectionist motives. Using data from China for 20002007 for 109 industries, we study the welfare effects of these measures. Counterfactual experiments imply total welfare losses of 2.2% for China due to the restriction on selling processing output domestically, and even larger loses of 5.7% for labor. Gains from only the tariff exemption for processing firms however are negligible.

Previous versions of this circulated under the titles Is Processing Good?: Theory and Evidence from China and Is Processing Trade Good?: Domestic Protection versus Export Promotion. We thank the Editor (Mary Amiti) and two anonymous referees for constructive comments and suggestions. We also thank Dominick Bartelme, Matilde Bombardini, Ariel Burstein, Lorenzo Caliendo, Davin Chor, Gene Grossman, Andrei Levchenko, Fernando Parro, Andrs Rodrguez-Clare, Alan Spearot, Daniel Xu, Zi Wang, Kei-Mu Yi, Miaojie Yu, Xiaodong Zhu, and seminar participants at the Canadian Economic Association annual meeting (Montreal), CDER (Wuhan), the Danish International Economics Workshop, Econometric Society Meetings (Seoul), RIDGE (Montevideo), Hong Kong University, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Jinan University, Kansas State University, McMaster University, National University of Singapore, NBER EASE, Peking University, Syracuse University, University of Alberta, and the University of Toronto. Danny Edgel provided excellent research assistance. This project is supported in part by funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

daswell calcium carbonate coating machine - coating line for gcc plant

Calcium carbonate coating machine for sale in Daswell machinery. Calcium carbonate powder surface coating machine is used to modify the surface of ground calcium carbonate powder. As a result, the property of the ground calcium carbonate powder will be changed. And with unique characteristics, coated calcium carbonate powder can be applied in wide range areas. Usually the machine is added to existing carbonate plant to produce both coated and normal types of calcium carbonate powder. Of course, you can build a new ground calcium carbonate production line with calcium carbonate coating machine. Henan Daswell machinery offers high quality calcium carbonate surface modification machine to produced coated ground calcium carbonate powder in consistent sizes with high activation rate.

Henan Daswell machinery is a leading supplier of ground calcium carbonate plant in China. Daswell can be the single source of complete designing and planning of your calcium carbonate plant. Besides,we also provides high grade equipment for your calcium carbonate production line with crushing, transferring, grinding, classifying, coating and packing system. Daswell calcium carbonate powder coating equipment is an advanced solution for producing coated calcium carbonate powder. In fact, to get more consistent sizes of coated ground calcium carbonate powder, the machine should work together with classifier. Actually, as stated above, the coating machine is often a part of ground calcium carbonate plant so that the calcium carbonate production line can produce both coated and uncoated calcium carbonate. And both the coated and natural ground calcium carbonate powder have many applications in different industries. As a result, the calcium carbonate production line with calcium carbonate surface treatment machine can have great economic value.

According to Wikipedia, powder coating is a type of coating that is applied as a free-flowing, dry powder. More specifically, powder coating is to apply additives to fine powder in order to improve product handling and performance. In the case of calcium carbonate coating, it means to add stearic acid to fine or ultra fine calcium carbonate powder, so that the surface properties of GCC powder can be changed. Initially, the ground calcium carbonate powder is hydrophilic, which can be unfriendly to organics like polymers. However, the plastic industry is also in urgent needs of cheap white filler. If ground calcium carbonate powder is added to plastics, a lot of frictions can occur due to the high surface energy of GCC powder particle. Yet when the surface of GCC powder is modified with steraic acid, the coated calcium carbonate powder become hydrophobic and can reduce the friction when added to plastics.

How to produce stearic acid coated calcium carbonate? Say you have a calcium carbonate grinding plant using a ball mill and classifier for particle size control, and you want to coating this ground calcium carbonate powder with stearic acid, what is the most suitable coating process for your plant. Of course, there is no one for all solution for coating ground calcium carbonate powder. And we can only provide you the suitable approach according to your needs, such as the particle size of GCC powder, the coating thickness, intended use, allowed residuals and so on. The fit solution is to add a coating machine and an air classifier. For this coating system for calcium carbonate powder further allows you to control the particle size of coated calcium carbonate, the coating thickness and so on.

The exact calcium carbonate coating process. Firstly, the GCC powder are mixed with stearic acid through respective feeder. Then the mixture of ground calcium carbonate powder with stearic acid is blown by hot air to the calcium carbonate coating machine. In the machine, the high speed turbo mixer starts to coating the powder in atomization process to reach high coating rate. Then the coated calcium carbonate will go to the air classifier carried by air. In the air classifier, the rejected coated calcium carbonate powder will be returned to coating machine for further coating, while the required coated calcium carbonate will go to the product silo. Of course, there is also dust collector and packing machines in the process.

As stearic acid coated calcium carbonate is hydrophobic, it is more friendly to organics like polymers than ground calcium carbonate powder. As a result, coated ground calcium carbonate powder can be used as filler in plastics for PVC, rubber, decorative paints, slippers, textile and other similar industries. Ground calcium carbonate coating machine in Daswell can produce quality coated calcium carbonate powder with high coating rate, high consistency, controlled particle sizes, and great brightness. As a result, produced coated calcium carbonate can applied in various industries with high economic value. So if you want to treat the surface of fine ground calcium carbonate powder, please contact Daswell for more information about our calcium carbonate coating machine. Please fill the form below to get free quotes. We will reply in 24 hours. Product Model: Your Name(required): Your Email(required): Your Tel: Your country: Your Company: Your Message(required):

material and energy requirement for rare earth production | springerlink

The use of rare earth metals (REMs) for new applications in renewable and communication technologies has increased concern about future supply as well as environmental burdens associated with the extraction, use, and disposal (losses) of these metals. Although there are several reports describing and quantifying the production and use of REM, there is still a lack of quantitative data about the material and energy requirements for their extraction and refining. Such information remains difficult to acquire as China is still supplying over 95% of the world REM supply. This article attempts to estimate the material and energy requirements for the production of REM based on the theoretical chemical reactions and thermodynamics. The results show the material and energy requirement varies greatly depending on the type of mineral ore, production facility, and beneficiation process selected. They also show that the greatest loss occurs during mining (2550%) and beneficiation (1030%) of RE minerals. We hope that the material and energy balances presented in this article will be of use in life cycle analysis, resource accounting, and other industrial ecology tools used to quantify the environmental consequences of meeting REM demand for new technology products.

In the past few years, rare earth metals (REMs) have received special attention because they are considered critical. In general, a resource is critical when it is scarce, is subject to potential supply constraints, costly, and is needed for a particular function where substitutes are inferior.15 Although REMs are relatively abundant in the Earths crust, discovered minable concentrations are mostly located in China, which provided over 95% of output in 2011. The remaining sources are in the United Stateswhere the mine at Mountain Pass in California resumed operationsplus Australia, India, Malaysia, and Brazil.6 Exploration to find rare earth ore deposits outside China continues, especially as the export limits and the ban on new mining permits in China continues. Talens Peir et al.7 showed that most scarce metals, including REMs, are distributed as trace elementsregarded as hitch hikerswith mineral ores of certain similar metals found in higher concentrations called attractors. As attractors and hitch hikers are very chemically and physically similar, their separation becomes the most important step during mineral processing. Separation at environmental temperature using basic chemical principles such as density, solubility, surface properties, and magnetic properties becomes the ideal processes as they need little energy input. For some metals, however, separation is based on melting points and electrical conductivity, which have greater energy requirements.

Mineral ores containing REMs are processed using standard methods for mining, extraction, and refining. However, their beneficiation and the separation of REMs into individual RE elements require more specific processes. The reactant used for chemical beneficiation depends on the chemical form of the REM in the mineral ore. Thus, REMs contained in bastnsite are beneficiated by digestion using sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid and by direct chlorination. Monazite is beneficiated by an acid or an alkali agent, whereas REMs in xenotime are obtained by sulfuric acid digestion. REMs are obtained as mixtures of chlorides, oxides, nitrates, and fluorides, which are later separated into individual REMs by solvent extraction using organic solvents.

Although process flowsheets describing the processes required for the production of REMs exist, there are no studies yet providing a comprehensive material and energy analysis of the production of REMs.8,9 Quantitative data about beneficiation and REM separation still remain confidential and are rarely available in industry reports or process descriptions. For instance, Ecoinvent, the reference database for consistent life cycle inventory data, does not include such information. As REMs are becoming essential in many applications, a detailed analysis of their production is needed to provide concise data for life cycle analysis, environmental evaluation, and economic analysis. In this article, we use basic chemistry and physics principles to quantify the material and energy requirements for the production of REMs. This article focuses especially on the chemical beneficiation of REs for each type of mineral ore: bastnsite, monazite, and xenotime. The process description includes recovery rates and estimates about the losses occurring during processing, all of which are useful in identifying areas for potential improvement and quantifying wastes that may become an additional source of these metals in the future.

About 17 REMs are usually found together, mostly in three major minerals: bastnsite with iron in Bayan Obo (Inner Mongolia), monazite and xenotime ores with radioactive thorium (Mountain View, California, and Kerala, India), and ion-adsorption clays.10,11 More than 95% of the rare earths occur in bastnsite, monazite, and xenotime.12 Bastnsite contains about 7075% rare earth oxides (REOs), monazite 6570%, and xenotime 6167%.9,11 Bastnsite ores ([Ce,La,Nd](CO3)F) are fluorocarbonates of cerium, lanthanum, neodymium, and other REMs. They occur in carbonatites, quartz veins, and epithermal fluorite-bearing veins. The worlds largest deposit is at Bayan Obo in Inner Mongolia, where bastnsite occurs together with monazite and other iron-bearing ores. In Bayan Obo, the main metals and minerals extracted are iron, rare earths, niobium, and fluorite. Bastnsite is the least problematic source of REO, as it hardly contains any radioactive thorium.9,13

Monazite ([Ce,La,Nd](PO4)) is a phosphate mainly formed with cerium, lanthanum, and neodymium elements. It occurs in igneous rocks, metamorphic rocks, and vein deposits, but the most important commercial source is from beach placers and sand deposits. The distribution of rare earth in monazite is variable and two samples from different locations hardly ever have the same distribution of mixed rare earth.12

Xenotime (YPO4) is also a phosphate that contains up to 63% yttrium oxide. It is a minor constituent of granite or gneiss and co-occurs in placer deposits. Commercially significant quantities occur in Malaysia, Indonesia, and Thailand. In Australia and China, xenotime occurs in association with ilmenite, rutile, and zircon-containing heavy mineral sands. In Brazil, there are recoverable quantities in the alluvial tin mine in the state of Amazonas.

Ion-adsorption clays are formed by the weathering of rare-earth-rich primary granite-type rock or volcanic rock followed by the adsorption of soluble rare earth species on clays. The weathering process also modifies the proportion of the various rare earths originally found in the source rock. Thus, the composition varies widely depending on the ore location.9 In general, they are rich in yttrium and mid-rare earths as europium, samarium, and gadolinium. Apart from the major sources briefly noted, there are others rare earth minerals that are potentially important: euxenite ((Y, Ca, Ce, U, Th)(Nb, Ta, Ti)2O6) and gadolinite (Be2FeY2Si2O10), although there is no large-scale processing of these currently.

The amount of each REM contained in different types of mineral ores and in different mine deposits is presented in TableI. The composition of each mineral varies from mine to mine depending on their location. In general, cerium, lanthanum, neodymium, and praseodymium are found in greater amounts in bastnsite and monazite. Yttrium together with other mid- and heavy rare earths as dysprosium and ytterbium is contained in greater concentration in xenotime and ion-adsorption clay.

In 2010, about 54,000tonnes of rare earths were produced from bastnsite in iron ores, 12,000tonnes from bastnsite, 11,000 from monazite and xenotime, and 37,000 from ion-adsorption clays, which totaled almost 114,000tonnes in 2010.7 There is a first group of REMs produced in annual amounts greater than 10,000tonnes (cerium, lanthanum, neodymium, and yttrium), a second group that includes praseodymium and dysprosium, both of which are produced in thousands of tonnes. Then, a last group of REMs formed by gadolinium, samarium, europium, and terbium all are produced in the order of hundreds of tonnes. Metals produced in amounts lower than 10,000tonnes can be regarded as hitch hikers or by-products of lanthanum, cerium, neodymium, and yttrium.7

For simplification purposes, we assume an average molecular weight of 120g/mol of REM. When the amounts are given as REOs, they include the amount of oxygen associated with the REM. The molecular weight of REO (RE2O3) assumed is 288g/mol. Thus, each tonne of REO is approximately composed by 83% REM and 17% oxygen. As an estimate, 1.20tonnes of REO is equivalent to 1tonne of REM.

The production of REMs can be divided in three main stages: mineral processing, reduction, and refining. Mineral processing includes mining, beneficiation, and the separation of each REM. REMs are open-pit mined using standard methods such as drill, blast, load, and haul. Then, they are physically beneficiated by separating finely divided minerals with similar physical properties and treated to extract REM. REMs contained in bastnsite can be extracted by digestion using sulfuric acid and hydrochloric acid, and by direct chlorination. Monazite is treated by an acid or an alkali agent, whereas REMs in xenotime are obtained by sulfuric acid digestion. The extracted REMs are then separated by solvent extraction, which is selected based on the chemical form of RE: chlorides, oxides, nitrates, and sulfates. Once REMs are separated, they are reduced by fused salt electrolysis or metallothermic reduction. Finally, REMs are refined to reduce the amount of impurities and obtain metals in 9899% purity. Figure1 shows a simplified flowsheet showing the stages for processing RE minerals and an approximate content of REO in each stage. In this article, we exclude the refining of individual RE as it depends on the final use and purpose of the metal.

The material and energy requirements are estimated theoretically using technical descriptions on process conditions, chemical reactions, and energy use. Major sources of information were based on literature information.8,9,1416 Data regarding the production of rare earths are generally given per tonne of ore mined or tonne of REO. The amount of primary ore mined and processed to obtain 1tonne of REM depends on the amount of REO contained in the ore and the recovery rate of REO. For example, the mineral ore from Bayan Obo contains 4.1% REO, whereas ore from Mountain Pass contains an average amount of 7.7% REO.11 The recovery rate of mineral resources varies from mine to mine and depends on the type of mineral ore. In Bayan Obo, the recovery rate of bastnsite and monazite increased from less than 10% in 2005 to about 60% in state-owned and to 40% in individually owned enterprises.17 By 2016, the recovery rate of those mines is expected to rise 75%. The recovery rate of mining and concentrating bastnsite in Sichuan is less than 50%, while that of in situ leaching of ion-adsorption clays increased from 26% to 75% from 1970s to the present.18 As result, for our calculations we use different recovery rates for the material and energy estimates based on data available. The results are generally expressed per tonne of REM.

Mineral processing includes the mining, beneficiation, and separation of rare earth. Although all rare earth minerals are generally open-pit mined, the energy requirement for crushing and grinding varies depending on their hardness and the gangue minerals associated. The physical and chemical beneficiation of bastnsite is different from that of monazite and xenotime, as bastnsite is a carbonate-fluoride mineral, and monazite and xenotime are both phosphate minerals. The separation of REMs depends on the chemical form in which they are extracted. The following section provides a detailed explanation of the processes and reactions involved for the processing of each type of RE mineral ores. At the end of the section, we include a table showing the material and energy inputs and outputs for each process.

About 95% of REMs occur in three minerals: bastnsite, monazite, and xenotime. The larger rare earth mine is located in Bayan Obo (China) and Mountain Pass (United States). The Bayan Obo mine contains bastnsite and monazite together with hematite and martite (Fe2O3), magnetite (Fe3O4), and rutile (TiO2). In Mountain Pass, the principal minerals occurring are 60% calcite (CaCO3), 20% barite (BaSO4), 10% bastnsite, and the remaining 10% of other minerals such as silica (SiO2). Typical hard rock ores are mined from the surface by open-pit methods. The ore is blasted, loaded into trucks and transported to a mill. Then, it is processed by crushing and grinding until at least 90% of the particles are no bigger than 0.15mm. At Mountain Pass, the primary ore is crushed in a jaw crusher in series with a cone crusher and then to a rod mill, which produces a 1.65-mm material that is later fed to a classifier in a closed circuit with a conical ball mill. The classifier feeds the material to four agitators. The first three agitators heat the slurry up to 93C, whereas the fourth cools the slurry to 60C. Subsequently, the granules are sent to flotation.19

Gupta estimated that the energy requirement associated to the open-pit mining, crushing, and grinding operations is in the range of 0.350.45GJ/tonne of ore mined and processed. Fine grinding is the most energy-intensive process and requires from 0.11GJ to 0.28GJ/tonne of ore depending on the hardness of the rock.14 The energy required to grind primary ores containing rare earths can be estimated based on the hardness of the mineral. Bastnsite has 45Mohs of hardness, similar to that of apatite (Ca5F(PO4)3).20 Consequently, the energy required for grinding bastnsite is similar than of apatite to 0.15mm and is estimated to be 0.06GJ/tonne of primary ore.8 This value is in line with the estimate given by the U.S. Bureau of Mines, which says that the energy to mine, crush, grind, and condition tonne of ore containing bastnsite is 0.1GJ and that almost two-thirds of the energy is spent only for grinding.19

The energy input for processing 1tonne of REMs varies depending on its concentration in the primary ore mined. At Mountain Pass, the ore mined contains an average of 7.7% of REO and the recovery rate is about 90% due to a very fine grinding of the minerals.21 Thus, 17tonnes of mineral ores and an energy input of 1.74GJ are needed to extract of 1tonne of REM. At Bayan Obo, the mineral ore contains 4.1% of REO and the average recovery rate is 50%; consequently, the extraction of 1tonne of REM requires mining almost 50tonnes of mineral ore and 6GJ of energy input.

Monazite and xenotime have hardness values of about 5 Mohs, both of which are similar to that of apatite. Most importantly, monazite resources and xenotime have already undergone weathering, transportation, and concentration processes as they co-occur in beach placers. As a result, none of these minerals require crushing and grinding operations. Gupta and Krishnamurthy estimated that the energy required for mining placer deposits varies from 0.02GJ to 0.07GJ/tonne of ore, mostly for physical concentration.9 Based on the amount of energy estimated by the Bureau of Mines, we calculate that each tonne of mineral ore containing REM requires about 0.4GJ.19 The grades of ion-adsorption deposits are the lowest containing 0.050.2% REO. The average ore grade of placer deposits containing monazite and xenotime in China is 0.51% REO. Thus, to obtain 1tonne of REM, 160tonnes of mineral ores and about 6.4GJ of energy are needed.22 TableII summarizes the REO grade, recovery rate of REO, the tonnes of mineral ores mined to recover 1 tonne of REM, and the energy required for such recovery.

In Bayan Obo, REMs are obtained from nonmagnetic tailings during the beneficiation of hematite (Fe2O3). The beneficiation of Bayan Obo mineral ore includes the flotation and the chemical beneficiation of REM by roasting with sulfuric acid. During flotation, RE concentrates are exposed to Na2CO3 as a pH regulator, and Na2SiO3 and NaSiF6 as gangue depressants. The concentrates contain 56% REO from both bastnsite and monazite sources.12 Bastnsite is separated from monazite due to the difference of their specific gravities using a shaking table. The bastnsite and monazite concentrates obtained contain about 68% and 45% REO, respectively. The total recovery of rare earth from the primary ore is about 72%; the remaining 28% is lost in the gangue.12 Thus, to obtain 1tonne of REM, 2.46tonnes of bastnsite concentrate and 3.72tonnes of monazite concentrate need to be further treated. For each tonne of RE concentrate obtained, about 0.40tonnes of REM are lost in the gangue.

The REMs contained in bastnsite are extracted by roasting with 98% sulfuric acid at 500C in a rotary kiln.9 Monazite concentrate is alkali treated as explained in the Monazite by alkali treatment (Rhne-Poulenc) section. Roasting, mostly used for sulfidic sources of metals, is one of the most important and the most complex of all the pyrometallurgical unit operations. This process is carried out by heating the sulfides in air or in oxygen. A sulfide ore or concentrate is roasted to: (I) oxidize partially the sulfur content; (II) oxidize to sulfates, also regarded as sulfation roasting; and (III) remove completely sulfur by converting all sulfur to oxides.14 The theoretical heat required to roast 1tonne of bastnsite at 500C can be calculated by doing an energy balance using Eq. (1):

where m is the mass of bastnsite in kg; C p is the heat capacity at constant pressure of bastnsite; T is the change of temperature in the furnace in K, from initial ambient temperature to 773K. The C p of bastnsite is calculated as the sum of the specific heat and the mass fraction of each of the chemical element of bastnsite and is estimated to be 0.44kJ/kgK.23 The energy requirement doing this estimation is 0.200.27GJ/tonne of bastnsite. Based on the fact that 2.46tonnes of bastnsite concentrate are needed to obtain 1tonne of REM, the energy required for roasting is about 0.490.66GJ/tonne of REM. A more realistic estimate can be done using data of the typical heat use by a long lime rotary kiln, which reaches a similar temperature to that of bastnsite roasting. A rotary kiln requires 6.09.2GJ of heat and 0.060.09GJ of electrical power to roast 1tonne of lime.24 Using data for lime roasting, the total energy input for roasting 1tonne of REM is between 6.06GJ and 9.29GJ.

RE sulfates are then precipitated as a double sodium sulfate by leaching with water and adding sodium chloride (solid liquid ratio 1:4). During dissolution, it is important to monitor temperature as the solubility of sulfates decreases with increasing temperature.

Once RE are in chloride form, they are separated by solvent extraction. TableIII shows the mass balance for the extraction of 1tonne of REM as chlorides from bastnsite based on the Bayan Obo process. From the 2.92tonnes of RE chlorides generated, about 35% is generated as co-product during the dissolution of RE sulfates with sodium chloride and considered as lost. Ideally, the process only loses 20% of the RE input; however, if we consider the yields of the reactions are not 100% and the unreacted materials containing RE are not recovered, then almost 60% of REMs are lost.

Kruesi and Duker of Molycorp (Greenwood Village, CO) developed another process to produce rare earth chlorides from bastnsite.26 After the ore is initially crushed, ground, classified, and concentrated to increase the rare earth concentrations from 15% to 60%, the bastnsite concentrate undergoes an acid digestion using hydrochloric acid to produce several rare earth chlorides. In practice, bastnsite concentrate is attacked in excess hydrochloric acid (1.8tonne of hydrochloric acid per tonne of mineral ore) at 93C.

The resulting mixture is filtered to separate the slurry and the cake. The cake contains rare earths that are further digested with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) to produce rare earth hydroxides. In the real-life process, 5tonnes of caustic soda are added per tonne of bastnsite concentrate.

At this stage, small amounts of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and sulfuric acid (H2SO4) are added to precipitate iron hydroxide (Fe(OH)3) and lead sulfate (PbSO4). Also, barium chloride (BaCl2) is added to precipitate the excess sulfate and remove thorium from the ore. The resulting mix is filtered to remove the cake (contains most of the impurities), and the solution is concentrated by evaporation. The wastes generated by the process include a sodium fluoride (NaF) filtrate, which is recovered for further processing, and filter cake, which is discarded. The recovery rate of REO is estimated to be 92%.9 TableIV shows the mass balance for the extraction of 1tonne of REM as chlorides from bastnsite following the Molycorp process. By this process, about 17% tonnes of RE are lost in unreacted bastnsite, RE fluoride, and hydroxide.

The Goldschmidt process is a direct chlorination at a high temperature (1,200C) used to obtain an anhydrous RE trichloride suited for the production of RE metals directly from bastnsite ore. In the furnace, RE fluorocarbons are converted to chlorides by gaseous chlorine. The RE chlorides are collected in the melt chamber as a nonvolatile fluid melt. The main reaction is as follows:

In practice, the amount of chlorine input is two times the theoretically calculated (0.91tonnes/tonne of RE chlorine). The recovery rate of rare earths is 97%. For each tonne of RE in chlorides, the process generates 0.50tonnes of RE as fluorides, which can be further processed following the Kruesi and Duker method (see the Bastnsite Using Molycorp Process Developed by Kruesi and Duker section) to obtain additional product. TableV shows the mass balance of the extraction of 1tonne of RE as chlorides using the Goldschmidt process.

The theoretical heat required by the furnace is about 0.941.21GJ/tonne of RE contained in bastnsite whereas the energy use in real processes is 1.442.16GJ/tonne RE chlorides.9 Thus, to obtain 1tonne of REE from bastnsite in Mountain Pass, between 4.26GJ and 6.32GJ are needed.

In China, Baotau concentrates (mainly bastnsite and monazite) have also been directly chlorinated in the presence of carbon at high temperature following a chlorination process that is similar to Goldschmidt process:

Concentrates are first mixed with Charcoal (ratio 1:0.0650.07) and pressed into briquettes that are dried at 120140C. Then, briquettes are chlorinated in a graphite reactor at 9501,100C. The chlorine consumption for this process is slightly lower than the Goldschmidt process, resulting in 0.84tonnes/tonne of RE chlorides, and the recovery rate of RE is 91%.9 As commented in the previous section, RE fluorides can be further processed to RE chlorides by digestion with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and then neutralized using hydrochloric acid (HCl) (see Bastnsite Using Molycorp Process Developed by Kruesi and Duker section). TableVI shows the mass balance of the extraction of RE using Goldschmidt process.

The theoretical heat required by the furnace is about 0.500.67GJ/tonne of ore. In real processes, the energy consumption is 3.6GJ/tonne of RE chlorides. Thus, 6.8GJ of energy are required to obtain 1tonne of REE.

The first step to recover rare earths and remove thorium from monazite is to apply to the mineral an acid or alkali treatment. The acid treatment uses sulfuric acid (H2SO4) to precipitate double sulfates and later recover rare earths from thorium by solvent extraction. Although this process was extensively used in the United States, it is no longer in commercial use, and the current process used is the alkali treatment process developed by Rhne-Poulenc using caustic soda (NaOH). By the addition of caustic soda, REs are precipitated in the form of hydroxides as a cake and trisodium phosphate (Na3PO4) is generated as by-product. In the usual industrial practice, monazite is attacked with a 6070% sodium hydroxide solution at 140150C.27

Alkali digestion can also be performed in one step, which enables about 50% savings in caustic soda consumption or at 170C under a pressure of several atmospheres. The resulting rare earth hydroxide cake is dissolved in nitric acid.

The process recovers 90% of the RE contained in monazite; 2.21tonnes of monazite are needed to obtain 1tonne of REM. TableVII shows the mass balance of the extraction of RE using the alkali treatment process. The amount of heat required theoretically is 0.06GJ/tonne of monazite.

Xenotime is first milled to a required particle size and then roasted in a furnace. Then, it undergoes a digestion with concentrated sulfuric acid (93%) in an acid to a solid weight ratio of 2.6:1 at 250300C for 12h.28 Leaching is uneconomical for concentrates containing less than 10% xenotime. The rare earth phosphates are converted to water-soluble sulfates, and phosphoric acid is generated as a by-product of the following reaction:

By sulfuric acid digestion, the RE phosphate is converted to the water-soluble sulfate. Cold water is used as the leachant for better recovery. Oxalic acid (H2C2O4) is added to the RE sulfate solution to precipitate RE oxalate.

The recovery of rare earths by processes such as double-sulfate precipitation is not possible because yttrium and the heavy rare earth sulfates are quite soluble. The sulfate solution is directly taken for separation. About 80% to 90% of RE are solubilized. For our calculations, we use an average recovery ratio of 85%. Thus, to obtain 1tonne of REE, almost 3tonnes of RE phosphates are needed. TableVIII shows the mass balance of the extraction of RE using the acid treatment process. The amount of heat required theoretically is 0.130.15GJ/tonne of xenotime.

In an alternative process, the fine-ground xenotime is treated by fusing it with molten caustic soda at 400C 29 or by mixing it with sodium carbonate and roasting at 900C for several hours.30 After leaching out the phosphates, the hydroxide residue is dissolved in a minimum amount of hydrochloric acid and is filtered from impurities such as silica, cassiterite, etc. The rare earths are recovered by precipitation as oxalates.

The separation of rare earth elements poses many difficulties due to the great similarity of their chemical properties. Various separation procedures can be used: fractional crystallization, fractional precipitation, ion exchange, and solvent extraction. By fractional crystallization, one or more rare earths in a mixture are precipitated by changing the salt concentrations in solution through evaporation or temperature control. Fractional precipitation involves adding a precipitating agent to selectively remove a metal from solution. Ion exchange consists of an exchange of ions between two electrolytes or between an electrolyte and an organic complex. It is usually used to produce highly pure rare earths in relatively small quantities and is not suitable for high volume production. Among all these procedures, the most widely used is solvent extraction.

Solvent extraction uses the ability of metals to form stable complexes with organic molecules that can be later separated by gravity. The separation of a substance occurs from one organic phase (phase 1) into a water phase (phase 2). Liquidliquid extraction is characterized by distribution coefficients, which vary greatly from element to element. For any element, the distribution coefficient is defined as its concentration in the organic phase divided by its concentration in the aqueous phase. Equation (2) shows how it is calculated for substance A:

For substance B similarly distributed as A, we can define the distribution coefficient D B. D A and D B provide information about which of the two substances concentrates preferably in each phase. The ratio of the distribution coefficients D A and D B is called separation factor (\( \alpha_{\text{B}}^{\text{A}} \)), defined by Eq. (3) as follows:

Separation between substance A and B happens when \( \alpha_{\text{B}}^{\text{A}} \) is either much more or <1. No separation is achieved when the value is similar to 1. Distribution coefficients and separation factor depend on the type of extractant. The selection of the extractants depends on the chemical form of rare earths: chloride, nitrates, sulfates, or oxides (see supporting information). The extractants commercially used most often for rare earth separation are di-2-ethyl-hexyl-phosphoric acid (HDEHP) for RE chlorides and sulfates, and tri-n-butyl phosphate (TBP) for RE nitrates. Other extractants used are 2-ethyl-hexyl-2-ethyl-hexyl-phosphoric acid (EHEHPA), versatic acid, versatic 10, and Aliquat 336. The extractant is usually dissolved in a suitable solvent to ensure good contact with the aqueous phase. A modifier is frequently added to the organic phase to improve the hydrodynamics of the system.

One of the first extractants used was TBP. TBP is the most effective extractant for nitrates of rare earths such as those obtained from monazite using the Rhne-Poulenc process. The liquidliquid extraction process can be represented by the following reaction:

The results obtained by Peppard et al.31,32 showed that TBP is an effective extractant to separate trivalent rare earths from one another. Several studies using TBP obtained 98% pure gadolinium oxide (Gd2O3) and 98% pure samarium oxide (Sm2O3); the separation beyond terbium is difficult.33 The separation factors for various rare earth pairs using TBP are given in the supporting information.

Another extractant frequently used is HDEHP (or HA in reaction nomenclature). HDEHP can extract REO from a variety of aqueous media including nitrate, sulfate, and chloride, even though it is considered to extract better from chloride medium. HDEHP is a typical cation exchange extractant, which displaces a hydrogen ion from the extractant by the extracted metal resulting in the formation of an electrically neutral organic soluble complex. The extraction can be represented by the following reaction:

The extraction yield increases with the increase in the atomic number of the metal. HDEHP gives good separation factors for all rare earth elements. The average separation between each rare earth is ~2.5, as illustrated in the supporting information.

The extractant EHEHPA in kerosene was also reported as useful for the extraction of rare earth chlorides. The extraction yield also increases with atomic number but is lower than for HDEHP. EHEHPA has higher separation factors and thus is more preferred and especially advantageous for the separation of heavy from light rare earths. Separation factors for EHEHPA are also given in the supporting information.

In industry, a first solvent extraction using chloride medium is done to separate REMs into subgroups. Then, the metals are separated into individual elements during a second solvent extraction process using a nitrate medium. Subgroups can be divided as light (La, Ce, Pr, Nd, etc.), middle (Sm, Eu, Gd, etc.) and heavy (Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu, Y) rare earths.34 In both solvent extraction processes, many repetitions of a single separation operation are necessary. The number of stages increases with the increase in purity of each individual rare earth produced. A minimum of 50 mixer-settler stages per stream is required to obtain a metal with a purity of four or five nines. For instance, Rhne-Poulenc which produces all rare earth with purities of >99.999% operates more than 1,000 separation units, some difficult separations alone requiring 60 of such units.15

Most of the solvent extraction work provides information about the concentration of solvent but does not provide information about the solvent-to-feed ratio necessary to perform a material balance for the process and to estimate the amount of solvent required for obtaining each REM. As result, and considering that the actual practices by industry remain secret, we only can provide rough estimates of the amount of solvent and electricity used based on information from other processes. In most processes, the solvent-to-feed ratio is normally 3:1. Assuming a recovery yield of 9095%, about 7.027.41tonnes of TBP dissolved in kerosene are needed for the extraction of 1tonne of REM.35 For instance, 7.04tonnes of kerosene containing TBP are used to extract 1tonne of yttrium oxide.16

REMs are extracted by using mixer settlers that first mix the phases together then allow the phases to separate by gravity during a settling stage, and finally, the metals are stripped out. The energy input required for this processes is basically the electricity required for pumping. The amount of electricity required to obtain 1tonne of REM can be estimated using data for the extraction of yttrium oxide (Y2O3) and uranium. The production of 1tonne of yttrium oxide (Y2O3) from uranium residues consumes 22GJ for the solvent extraction and 0.7GJ for stripping.16 The electricity inputs required for the extraction and stripping of 1tonne of uranium are 0.3GJ and 0.01GJ per stage, assuming that the process requires at least 50 repetitions, the electricity input is 15.25GJ and 0.36GJ, respectively.36 Thus, about 15.6022.7GJ of electricity is required to extract 1tonne of an individual REM.

Once all REMs are separated by solvent extraction, there are two methods to obtain pure REM: metallothermic reduction and electrolysis. The metallothermic reduction of RE oxides, anhydrous RE chlorides, and fluorides produces high-purity REM. It can be also used at a high temperature to produce RE mixtures with specific compositions that cannot be obtained by fused salt electrolysis.9 The reaction of reduction can be represented as follows:

where M is the metal to recover; X is oxygen, fluorine, or chlorine; and R is the reducing agent that can be hydrogen, carbon, or other metals such as lithium, sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, or aluminum.

The theoretical energy required to reduce any metal is the sum of the latent and sensible heats. The latent heat is the internal energy associated with the phase of a system. The sensible heat is the heat exchanged by a substance.37 The sensible heat of a substance can be calculated using Eq. (4).

where m is the mass, C p is the specific heat capacity, and T is the change in temperature. The specific heat is defined as the energy required to raise the temperature of a unit mass of a substance by one degree (usually Celsius or Kelvin) as the pressure remains constant.

The amount of energy absorbed or released during a phase-change process is called latent heat. The latent heat of fusion is the heat supplied to a solid body at the melting point.37 The standard enthalpy of formation is the enthalpy change when 1mole of a pure substance is formed from its elements.

where Q is the amount of energy released or absorbed during the change of phase of the substance (kJ), m is the mass of the substance (kg), and H f is the specific latent heat of fusion for a particular substance (kJ/kg). The enthalpy of fusion is the change in enthalpy resulting from heating one mol of a substance to change its state from a solid to a liquid. The temperature at which this occurs is the melting point. For instance, the reduction of 1tonne of cerium requires a total of 0.334GJ: 0.147GJ for melting and 0.187GJ for phase change. The supporting information includes the values for specific heats and the enthalpy of fusion for each REM.

The second method to obtain pure REMs is electrolysis. By electrolysis, REMs are separated when electrical energy is applied in an electrolytic cell. The most common types of processes using electrolysis are electrowinning and electrorefining. Electrowinning refers to the reduction of metals from solution to the solid state. It is used to recover metals in aqueous solution, usually as the result of an ore having undergone one or more hydrometallurgical processes. The two electrodes are placed in a solution (electrolyte) containing metal ions, and an electric current is passed between them. The metal of interest is plated onto the cathode, while the anode is an inert electrical conductor. Electrorefining starts with impure metal, oxidizes it into solution, and then reduces it back to the pure solid state. It is used to dissolve an impure metallic anode (typically from a smelting process) and produce a high-purity cathode. Fused salt electrolysis is another electrometallurgical process whereby the valuable metal has been dissolved into a molten salt that acts as the electrolyte, and the valuable metal collects on the cathode of the cell. It is conducted at temperatures sufficient to keep both the electrolyte and the metal being produced in the molten state. In electrolysis, the theoretical specific power consumption can be calculated as a function of cell voltage by combining Joules law and Faradays law.38

where P is the power consumed (kWh), m is the mass of deposited metal (kg), V is the cell voltage (V), F is Faradays constant (96,485C/mol), z is the valence of the deposited ion (for RE z equals to 3), M is the atomic weight (g/mol), and t is the plating time in hours. Equation (6) can be redefined for a certain amount of metal to be deposited and using the number of moles (n) instead of the mass of the deposited metal (m) and the atomic weight (M) leading to Eq. (7).

In the electrolysis of rare earth chlorides (RECl3), the valence of the deposited ion is normally three. The theoretical voltage is about 4V, although in real life the net voltage is usually greater than the theoretical estimation due to power losses. The efficiency of the cell must be also considered in the estimation. Shedd et al.39 estimated the average voltage to be 8.5V and the current efficiency at 37%. The energy use to obtain 1tonne of an individual REM varies from 38GJ to 48GJ, expect from scandium and yttrium, which require 148GJ and 75GJ/tonne, respectively. Electrolysis is also used to produce mischmetal containing mainly lanthanum, cerium, neodymium, and praseodymium. For a mixture of RE obtained from a treated bastnsite with a molecular mass of 120g/mol, the power consumed is 55.45GJ/tonne. This value is on the range of 48.9657.60GJ/tonne estimated by other authors.9 Habashi estimated an energy consumption of 3654GJ/tonne of mischmetal (a combination of lanthanum, cerium, praseodymium, neodymium, and samarium).8 The supporting information includes thermodynamic data and calculations done to estimate the energy required to recover 1tonne of REM by reduction and electrolysis, as well as a typical analysis of mischmetal obtained by the electrolysis of RE.

The objective of this work is to provide a first estimate of the material and energy requirements for the production of REMs to aid scientists in evaluating the ever-increasing use in todays technologies. Because company data are generally confidential and off limits, these estimates are based on process descriptions and thermodynamics. TableIX summarizes the material and energy requirement for the extraction of REM from different mineral ores and their recovery rates. As shown in the table, the energy required for mining RE depends on the ore grade and on the recovery yield, which vary from 50% to 90% depending on the facility; Mountain Pass has the highest recovery rate registered. The recovery of RE from placer deposits requires the extraction of greater amount of ores, 10 times that of Mountain Pass, but it has a similar energy consumption (0.4GJ/tonne of REM higher) to that the mining of Bastnsite Ore in Bayan Obo.

The process for the beneficiation of REM highly depends on the chemical form of RE in the mineral ore. Bastnsite beneficiated using chlorine has higher recovery yield (9197%) and a lower energy consumption (0.036.80GJ/tonne of REM) than using sulfuric acid (with 72% recovery yield and 6.069.29GJ/tonne of REM), especially because for chlorination processes, the roasting of the concentrate is not required. The beneficiation of REM is the stage with the highest material input requirement, specifically the beneficiation of bastnsite from Bayan Obo, which requires 21.44tonnes of reactants compared to that of xenotime and monazite, which require 9.14tonnes and 3.18tonnes, respectively. The material and energy requirement for separating each REM by solvent extraction are rough estimates based on other process description and require further research. RE can be reduced by metallothermic reduction or electrolysis. The energy requirement for metallothermic reduction is also a theoretical estimate, and less realistic that the energy use for electrolysis that is based on process data given for the electrolysis of other metals.

In the light of these preliminary results, we can say that the energy requirement for beneficiation depends on the type of mineral ore; for instance, the production of 1tonne of REM from bastnsite in Bayan Obo requires a minimum energy input of 12.06GJ, whereas 1tonne of REM from Mountain Pass needs 1.73GJ. The most energy-intensive stages in the production of REM are the separation of each RE by solvent extraction (15.6022.70GJ/tonne of REM) and the reduction of each RE, whose energy consumption varies from 38 to 48GJ. For instance, the electrolysis of 1tonne of REM from Mountain Pass, which contains mainly cerium, lanthanum, and neodymium, as described in the supporting information, requires 47.34GJ of energy. In overall, the mineral processing and reduction of 1tonne of an individual REM have an average energy intensity of 58.51GJ, which is similar to that of manganese (58GJ/tonne) but higher than base metals like iron (28GJ/tonne) and lead (31GJ/tonne).14

Performing detailed material balances also helps to identify where further amounts of REM are generated, which, if exploited, can provide additional sources of REMs. REMs are lost mainly as unreacted minerals and by-products as RE fluorites, sulfates, and chlorides during beneficiation. The greatest loss occurs mainly during mining (up to 50%) and beneficiation (up to 28%) in Bayan Obo. The recovery of those REM depends on the type and chemical form of the gangue minerals and reactants they end up with. Information about the composition of gangue minerals and tailings is hard if not impossible to find; thus, it is not possible to provide an educated estimate of the amount of REM potentially recoverable. The production of REM from Mountain Pass is a good example to show how increasing the recovery yield from existing mines and during beneficiation helped increase the amount of REM production. Improving recovery yields of REM involves a significant reengineering of extraction and refining processes, originally designed to concentrate and recover iron ores rather than rare earths considered traditionally contaminants of iron.

Battelle Columbus Laboratories, Energy Use Patterns in Metallurgical and Nonmetallic Mineral Processing (Phase 6-Energy Data and Flowsheets, Low Priority Commodities) (Columbus: BattelleColumbus Laboratories, 1976).

D. Schueler, M. Buchert, R. Liu, S. Dittrich, and C. Merz, Study on Rare Earths and Their RecyclingFinal Report for The Greens/EFA Group in the European Parliament (Darmstadt: Oeko-Institut e. V., 2011).

E.S. Shedd, J.D. Marchant, and M.M. Wong, Electrowinning Misch Metal from a Treated Bastnsite Concentrate, Bureau of Mines Report of Investigations 7398 (Washington, D.C: U.S. Department of Interior, 1970).