kariobangi stone crusher haryana 2017

shivalik stone crusher grain udyog samiti v. kishan singh & anr. s | punjab & haryana high court | judgment | law | casemine

In this review petition, learned counsel for the applicant-appellant has submitted that evidence, in support of his case, placed on the record of the case before the courts below, was not considered, despite the fact that written arguments were placed on record.

Elaborating his argument further, learned counsel for the review applicant-appellant has further stated that the factum of ignoring the evidence placed on record by the trial Court was submitted before this Court, still no finding has been given by this Court on the evidence placed on record by the appellant. In support of his case, learned counsel for the applicant-appellant has placed on record certified copies of the evidence produced by him as well as the written arguments before the Courts below.

I have heard learned counsel for the applicant-appellant. It may be noticed that the argument raised by learned counsel for the applicant-appellant was noticed by this Court. In fact, under the garb of this petition, by referring to the documents as well as written arguments placed on record with the review petition, learned counsel for the applicant-appellant wants the re-hearing of the case, which is not permissible. There is no error apparent on record of the appeal.

By clicking on this tab, you are expressly stating that you were one of the attorneys appearing in this matter. Before confirming, please ensure that you have thoroughly read and verified the judgment. In case of any confusion, feel free to reach out to us.Leave your message here.